Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search
Welcome to the Hull and East Riding Astronomical Society Forum
Saturn
Jupiter
The Sun
The Moon
Mars
Shuttle
H.E.R.A.S.
May 26, 2013, 06:35:19 AM
Home
Forum
Help
Search
Calendar
Login
Register
H.E.R.A.S.
-
The Image Gallery
-
Deep Space
-
Whirlpool Galaxy
H.E.R.A.S
Content
Society Programme
Society History
The Committee
Astronomy Intro
Star Chart
Courses in Astronomy
Local/National Societies
Meeting info/Directions
Friday Night Observing
Moon Phases 2013
Equipment Suppliers
Useful Links
Administrator
User
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
May 26, 2013, 06:35:19 AM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Modules
Themes
SMF Default Theme -
Babylon Theme
Epsilon TP
Pn-Pn (for 1.1 RC2)
EnterpriseTP
Pages: [
1
]
« previous
next »
Print
Author
Topic: Whirlpool Galaxy (Read 550 times)
aspeed
Newbie
Posts: 35
Whirlpool Galaxy
«
on:
March 24, 2012, 11:36:31 AM »
Whirlpool galaxy taken earlier this week.
Details: 8" Meade SCT & f6.3 reducer, EOS 300D, unguided. 15 exposures of 120s at ISO 1600. Stacked in IRIS and tidied up in Paintshop Pro
Arthur
Logged
flamencopaul
Sr. Member
Posts: 399
Re: Whirlpool Galaxy
«
Reply #1 on:
March 25, 2012, 01:08:25 AM »
Good that you're getting 120secs unguided, you must have hardly any periodic error in your drive, and that has led to a good result.
With regards camera noise, I can already say that my new camera is a lot less noisy than the 300D - this is without using any of the inbuilt noise reduction and is based on a comparison of RAW dark frames in IRIS. Whether or not this is due to tech advances in chip design, or just that the 300D is 10 years old and has seen a lot of use. With the 300D, I found that the extra gain in sensitivity at ISO 1600 wasn't worth the extra noise. There is an article somewhere in the IRIS webpages that compares noise at different ISO settings. The general consensus of opinion is that ISO 800 is the optimal setting. There are a number of ways of reducing noise...the best is simply to take more images to stack. With 30 or so subs, a sigma-median stack in IRIS pretty much removes any stray hot pixels, and even does a decent job with satellite and aircraft trails.
Looking forwards to seeing more of your images.
Paul.
Logged
Pages: [
1
]
Print
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Astronomy
-----------------------------
=> General Discussion
=> News & Events
=> What's in the sky tonight?
=> Observation Station
-----------------------------
Equipment Centre
-----------------------------
=> Equipment for Sale
-----------------------------
Help & Assistance
-----------------------------
=> Useful Links
=> Telescopes and Equipment inc Software
=> Solar System Question Time
=> Miscellaneous Question Time
-----------------------------
Astronomy
-----------------------------
=> Members Pictures
-----------------------------
Off Topic
-----------------------------
=> The Observatory
-----------------------------
The Society
-----------------------------
=> Minutes of Meetings
-----------------------------
Astronomy
-----------------------------
=> Observing Sessions
=> Observatory Project
-----------------------------
The Society
-----------------------------
=> Society Talks
=> About our Society
=> Society News
=> Society Discussion
-----------------------------
Help & Assistance
-----------------------------
=> Astronomy Science Questions
=> Doing astronomy
-----------------------------
Equipment Centre
-----------------------------
=> Wanted
=> Equipment Reviews
-----------------------------
The Image Gallery
-----------------------------
=> The Sun and Moon
=> Solar System Objects
=> Deep Space
=> Miscellaneous
-----------------------------
Help & Assistance
-----------------------------
=> Imaging Help
Powered by SMF 1.1 RC2
|
SMF © 2001-2005, Lewis Media
TinyPortal v0.8.6 ©
Bloc
Enterprise
design by
Bloc